Founder's Statement: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<i>        </i><i> “Whenever I hear that we need a national dialogue, as in, we need a national dialogue on gun control, police reform, or voter rights, I wonder, where exactly would we have that dialogue? In the newspapers, on social media, in our courts? These venues are ill-suited for </i><i>substantive </i><i>national</i><i> </i><i>dialogues.”</i><i>  ... </i><i>'''Michael Sussman'''</i></br>
[[File:1 Connecting Close-up.jpg|right|frameless|321x321px]]
<span style = "padding-left:55em;">-</span>


Too often, industrial sectors operate in fragmented silos striving to reach arbitrary and, at times, conflicting goals. Industrial development occurs as a series of individual projects instead of whole systems. We must redesign our supply chains to be as efficient and sustainable as possible to survive the threats of climate change. Addressing these challenges requires unprecedented collaboration between all stakeholders within a forum that allows us to build trust and create real action plans.  CAPSI convenes stakeholders across all industrial sectors to facilitate whole systems planning for profitable and sustainable industrial systems. We do this through IntelliSynthesis®, our inquiry-based dialogue process within topic-focused IntelliConferences®. 
=== Why Have We Created OnTrackNorthAmerica? ===
<blockquote>''“Whenever I hear that we need a national dialogue, as in, we need a national dialogue on gun control, police reform, or voter rights, I wonder, where exactly would we have that dialogue? In the newspapers, on social media, in our courts? These venues are ill-suited for substantive national dialogues.”''  '''- Michael Sussman'''</blockquote>


As a society, we aren’t lacking intelligence. What we lack is a communication framework that builds solutions without being derailed by excessive competition, mistrust, or vested interests focused on short-term profits and maintaining power. Over thirty years as trusted advisors working with thousands of partners from industry, government, academia, and community organizations, OnTrackNorthAmerica has developed IntelliSynthesis®, a powerful tool for mobilizing the knowledge, intelligence, and goodwill all around us. The more elements of a system we identify, measure, and consider, the more we turn its interactions into positive synergies. Despite preconceptions, addressing all elements of a system makes it easier to build consensus and develop action plans. New solutions appear that would have otherwise been concealed.  
'''This absence cripples our public policy—and our industrial systems.''' Industrial sectors operate as fragmented silos pursuing conflicting goals. Industrial development becomes isolated projects rather than integrated systems. Climate disruption and supply chain failures demand we redesign these systems for profitability and sustainability.


Supply chain shortcomings became public during COVID-19 when goods were stalled at ports and intermodal transfer points for months. The Biden administration responded with a massive public investment in infrastructure. Unfortunately, this precious capital is allotted for individual competing projects while overall system inefficiencies remain. Consequently, we continue to stimulate more highway-centric supply chain activity and underutilize railroads’ energy, space, and capital efficiencies for moving heavy weight over land.  
These challenges require collaboration across all stakeholders. OTNA brings together industry, government, academia, and communities for whole systems planning. '''We do this through [[Industrial Systems Initiatives]], using [[IntelliConferences|IntelliConferences®]] and [[IntelliSynthesis|IntelliSynthesis®]].'''


Consider how transportation has typically been planned, or more accurately, not planned. Supply chains have evolved as a chaotic response to shippers’ and developers' indiscriminate land transactions, regardless of the transportation inefficiencies those choices impose. Railroads, ocean carriers, freight forwarders, ports, trucking companies, distributors, and shippers operate in a competitive, and in some cases monopolistic, mode, neither of which allows for the collaboration needed for supply chain efficiency. Creating sustainable, multimodal industrial systems compels us to transition to comprehensive supply chain, land use, and transportation planning.
The missing ingredient isn't intelligence—it's infrastructure for collaboration. We have lacked a framework for building solutions without being derailed by competition and mistrust. Over thirty years working with thousands of stakeholders, we developed IntelliSynthesis to synthesize stakeholder knowledge into smart policies and investments.    


Yes, a profound shift is needed. If not transformed, this mistrust will cost us and our children the chance of a sustainable, prosperous future. Fortunately, when we approach conversations openly and acceptingly, we inspire trust and cooperation in others. In co-creating CAPSI, stakeholders envision, articulate, and commit to shared principles, protocols, and desired outcomes. When people shift from a competitive to a collaborative mindset, they create policies, programs, and commercial opportunities that serve the collective good. As individuals, we can only go so far; together, we will reach our highest potential by tapping into our collective intelligence.
Most assume that limiting stakeholder input speeds solutions. We've found the opposite: addressing all system elements builds consensus faster and reveals solutions that narrow approaches miss. The more we examine system interactions, the more we turn them into positive synergies.  


<i>         “These are powerful ambitions. Thankfully, we now have the tools to produce action plans for success. Time is of the essence. We live in a critical moment of </i><i>potential </i><i>environmental </i><i>collapse </i><i>alongside the need to expand economic vitality to more people. </i><i>R</i><i>edesigning industrial systems will deliver both environmental and economic sustainability. Join us in CAPSI for a brighter</i> <i>future!”</i></br>
'''Our transportation networks illustrate exactly why this systems approach matters.''' Consider how transportation has typically been planned, or more accurately, not planned. '''Supply chains have evolved as a chaotic response''' to shippers' and developers' site choices made without regard to transportation impacts. COVID-19 exposed supply chain gaps. The response was massive infrastructure investment. Unfortunately, this capital continues to be allotted for individual competing projects while serious system inefficiencies remain. '''Despite railroad's ability to move freight using one-third the fuel and producing one-third the emissions of trucks,''' we continue to stimulate highway-centric development while leaving railroads' energy, space, and capital efficiencies underutilized.
<span style = "padding-left:19em;">-Michael Sussman</span>
 
'''The root problem is structural.''' Stakeholders operate in a competitive and, in some cases, monopolistic mode, neither of which allows for the collaboration needed for rail development and supply chain efficiency. To create sustainable, multimodal industrial systems, we must shift toward integrated planning of supply chains, land use, and transportation. 
 
<blockquote>''"Yes, a profound shift is necessary—and urgent. We live in a critical moment of potential environmental collapse alongside the need to expand economic opportunity. Redesigning industrial systems will deliver both environmental and economic sustainability. '''Join us to build industrial systems that match our intelligence!”''' -'''''Michael Sussman'''</blockquote>

Latest revision as of 15:25, 3 January 2026

Why Have We Created OnTrackNorthAmerica?

“Whenever I hear that we need a national dialogue, as in, we need a national dialogue on gun control, police reform, or voter rights, I wonder, where exactly would we have that dialogue? In the newspapers, on social media, in our courts? These venues are ill-suited for substantive national dialogues.” - Michael Sussman

This absence cripples our public policy—and our industrial systems. Industrial sectors operate as fragmented silos pursuing conflicting goals. Industrial development becomes isolated projects rather than integrated systems. Climate disruption and supply chain failures demand we redesign these systems for profitability and sustainability.

These challenges require collaboration across all stakeholders. OTNA brings together industry, government, academia, and communities for whole systems planning. We do this through Industrial Systems Initiatives, using IntelliConferences® and IntelliSynthesis®.

The missing ingredient isn't intelligence—it's infrastructure for collaboration. We have lacked a framework for building solutions without being derailed by competition and mistrust. Over thirty years working with thousands of stakeholders, we developed IntelliSynthesis to synthesize stakeholder knowledge into smart policies and investments.

Most assume that limiting stakeholder input speeds solutions. We've found the opposite: addressing all system elements builds consensus faster and reveals solutions that narrow approaches miss. The more we examine system interactions, the more we turn them into positive synergies.

Our transportation networks illustrate exactly why this systems approach matters. Consider how transportation has typically been planned, or more accurately, not planned. Supply chains have evolved as a chaotic response to shippers' and developers' site choices made without regard to transportation impacts. COVID-19 exposed supply chain gaps. The response was massive infrastructure investment. Unfortunately, this capital continues to be allotted for individual competing projects while serious system inefficiencies remain. Despite railroad's ability to move freight using one-third the fuel and producing one-third the emissions of trucks, we continue to stimulate highway-centric development while leaving railroads' energy, space, and capital efficiencies underutilized.

The root problem is structural. Stakeholders operate in a competitive and, in some cases, monopolistic mode, neither of which allows for the collaboration needed for rail development and supply chain efficiency. To create sustainable, multimodal industrial systems, we must shift toward integrated planning of supply chains, land use, and transportation.

"Yes, a profound shift is necessary—and urgent. We live in a critical moment of potential environmental collapse alongside the need to expand economic opportunity. Redesigning industrial systems will deliver both environmental and economic sustainability. Join us to build industrial systems that match our intelligence!” -Michael Sussman

Retrieved from "https://ontracknorthamerica.org/index.php?title=Founder%27s_Statement&oldid=8115"