Document Searching: Difference between revisions
From OnTrackNorthAmerica
(Created page with "== Suggestions == 4/3/24 from Jordyn: <nowiki>*</nowiki> I think the BOWs should be systematic. For example, if you are putting a document for Rosedale, it would either start with Rosedale Document or the first word would be Rosedale and end with document (Ex: Rosedale Document: Action Plan or Rosedale Action Plan Document). * As the database continues to expand there is the potential of data getting lost in the sauce if our facilitators do not have a uniformed approac...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
4/3/24 from Jordyn: | 4/3/24 from Jordyn: | ||
* I think the BOWs should be systematic. For example, if you are putting a document for Rosedale, it would either start with Rosedale Document or the first word would be Rosedale and end with document (Ex: Rosedale Document: Action Plan or Rosedale Action Plan Document). | |||
* As the database continues to expand there is the potential of data getting lost in the sauce if our facilitators do not have a uniformed approach to entries. | * As the database continues to expand there is the potential of data getting lost in the sauce if our facilitators do not have a uniformed approach to entries. | ||
* If a person knows they need a specific project document (let’s use Rosedale as the example again), but they don’t know exactly what one, by searching “Rosedale document” all the Rosedale documents should come up. | |||
* Admin Comments | |||
** This is not a problem with BOWs. Jordyn wants to be able to do a quick find on source documents. He would do an advance search in the facilitator namespace for the name of the document | |||
* This is not a problem with BOWs. Jordyn wants to be able to do a quick find on source documents. He would do an advance search in the facilitator namespace for the name of the document | |||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 8 April 2024
Suggestions
4/3/24 from Jordyn:
- I think the BOWs should be systematic. For example, if you are putting a document for Rosedale, it would either start with Rosedale Document or the first word would be Rosedale and end with document (Ex: Rosedale Document: Action Plan or Rosedale Action Plan Document).
- As the database continues to expand there is the potential of data getting lost in the sauce if our facilitators do not have a uniformed approach to entries.
- If a person knows they need a specific project document (let’s use Rosedale as the example again), but they don’t know exactly what one, by searching “Rosedale document” all the Rosedale documents should come up.
- Admin Comments
- This is not a problem with BOWs. Jordyn wants to be able to do a quick find on source documents. He would do an advance search in the facilitator namespace for the name of the document
