IntelliConferences: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Overview of CAPSI IntelliConference® Process'''</br>
Typical conferences draw hundreds of people who listen passively to speakers and their PowerPoint presentations. Even when hallway and dinner conversations are lively, the energy fades by the time participants start their next workday.
CAPSI convenes stakeholders in IntelliConference® processes that apply IntelliSynthesis®, our breakthrough question-and-response dialogue method, to generate efficient input from small or large groups of diverse stakeholders. IntelliSynthesis facilitates our collective intelligence.


'''Documentation and Methodology'''</br>
OnTrackNorthAmerica’s IntelliConferences® bring together stakeholders, online and in person, for efficient discussions that harness collective intelligence, resulting in improved solutions, better-informed decisions, and effective action.
IntelliConferences capture and catalog all perspectives, conversation details, and thinking in a transparent, continuously evolving record that becomes the long-term project plan, informing future reports, presentations, and action plans. This methodology employs guided inquiry by a facilitation team to elicit and expand each participant's thinking. Collective action is one of the biggest hurdles in designing collaborative action plans, and our IntelliSynthesis-based IntelliConferences overcome that obstacle.


'''Advantages Over Traditional Collaboration Methods'''</br>
=== Efficient, Effective Engagement ===
CAPSI IntelliConferences® transcend the limitations of social media and typical in-person gatherings by focusing on the collective intelligence of a diverse team that has come together to solve a significant problem. It is a simple yet elegant approach to group dialogue that supercharges the public and private sector's ability to collaborate for more profitable industrial activity that benefits society.
IntelliConferences present a path-breaking approach to small- and large-group dialogue that greatly reduces participants’ time commitment while increasing the impact and satisfaction of the interaction. This approach is driven by our inquiry-based method for dialogue and thinking called [[IntelliSynthesis|IntelliSynthesis®]].


'''Stakeholder Engagement Process'''</br>
{| class="wikitable"
Academic leaders, business executives, government officials, and other stakeholders agree to collaborate fully and transparently, moving beyond the siloed thinking of their institutions, companies, and agencies to discuss and tackle the topic's nuances and intricacies. All perspectives and essential conversation details are captured and tracked in an open-source dialogue record that becomes the long-term project plan and informs future reports and presentations. Of critical importance, IntelliSynthesis® enables confidentiality of sensitive perspectives at any participant's request.
|+
 
!Traditional Processes ❌
'''Facilitation and Outcomes'''</br>
!IntelliConferences ✅
Each IntelliConference® is facilitated by trained individuals who may also be subject-matter experts. These individuals ensure forward progress is sustained and camaraderie is intact. An IntelliConference® is an empowering experience for participants, as they see that all contributions are respected and appreciated for their merit. In the mix of ideas, pragmatic solutions emerge that were previously inaccessible. Outlier perspectives are honored and addressed by either supporting the group in opening up to the value of the outlier view or assisting the participant with the outlier view to embrace the group's direction.
|-
|'''Fixed meeting schedules''' require participants to travel or go online at pre-determined times.
|'''Asynchronous flexibility''' allows participants to read and respond on their own schedules, from wherever they are.
|-
|'''Inadequate facilitation''' results in chaotic banter or polite, unproductive conversation that leaves essential questions unanswered.
|'''Call and response''' is initiated by the facilitation team, who language the dialogue agenda as questions, rather than phrases.
|-
|'''Participants are expected to read''' what everyone has written, wasting valuable time.
|'''The facilitation team summarizes''' each rounds’ input, saving participants time and stimulating enthusiastic participation and real results.
|-
|'''Participation is spotty''' with a majority of the input coming from the loudest few.
|'''Participation is robust''' driven by a set of reasonable agreements signed by each participant at registration, with adherence tracked and cheered.
|-
|'''Squabbles and entrenched positions''' flare up when participants are forced to respond directly to previous posts.
|'''The facilitation team identifies outlier perspectives''' that may be highly valuable or reflect an issue that must be resolved for the engagement to advance.
|-
|'''Sharing some views can be risky''' if forced to do so publicly.
|'''Anonymity''' is an option wherein participants can choose public or private on all or some of their input.
|}
inlinecomments

Latest revision as of 21:54, 24 November 2025

Typical conferences draw hundreds of people who listen passively to speakers and their PowerPoint presentations. Even when hallway and dinner conversations are lively, the energy fades by the time participants start their next workday.

OnTrackNorthAmerica’s IntelliConferences® bring together stakeholders, online and in person, for efficient discussions that harness collective intelligence, resulting in improved solutions, better-informed decisions, and effective action.

Efficient, Effective Engagement

IntelliConferences present a path-breaking approach to small- and large-group dialogue that greatly reduces participants’ time commitment while increasing the impact and satisfaction of the interaction. This approach is driven by our inquiry-based method for dialogue and thinking called IntelliSynthesis®.

Traditional Processes ❌ IntelliConferences ✅
Fixed meeting schedules require participants to travel or go online at pre-determined times. Asynchronous flexibility allows participants to read and respond on their own schedules, from wherever they are.
Inadequate facilitation results in chaotic banter or polite, unproductive conversation that leaves essential questions unanswered. Call and response is initiated by the facilitation team, who language the dialogue agenda as questions, rather than phrases.
Participants are expected to read what everyone has written, wasting valuable time. The facilitation team summarizes each rounds’ input, saving participants time and stimulating enthusiastic participation and real results.
Participation is spotty with a majority of the input coming from the loudest few. Participation is robust driven by a set of reasonable agreements signed by each participant at registration, with adherence tracked and cheered.
Squabbles and entrenched positions flare up when participants are forced to respond directly to previous posts. The facilitation team identifies outlier perspectives that may be highly valuable or reflect an issue that must be resolved for the engagement to advance.
Sharing some views can be risky if forced to do so publicly. Anonymity is an option wherein participants can choose public or private on all or some of their input.