360° Stakeholder Mapping: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
(initial page commit)
 
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= 360° Stakeholder Mapping =
<p id="mwBA">OnTrackNorthAmerica has pioneered an <b id="mwBQ">innovative approach to stakeholder identification and cataloging</b> that supercharges facilitation, collaboration, and results for any challenge or opportunity. We have successfully used this methodology for over thirty years, advising on infrastructure projects across 47 U.S. states and Canadian provinces. 360° Stakeholder Mapping serves as the cornerstone of all OTNA Initiatives and IntelliConferences®.</p>Stakeholder engagement is often thwarted right out of the gate by the basic question, '''"Who are the stakeholders?"''' The answer can seem overwhelming until you systematically create a detailed list of stakeholder groups within an industrial system or geographic area. Without this framework, identifying all relevant parties is difficult.


OnTrackNorthAmerica has pioneered an approach to stakeholder identification and cataloging that supercharges facilitation, collaboration, and results for any problem or opportunity. We have successfully applied this approach for over thirty years, advising on infrastructure projects in 47 U.S. states and Canadian provinces.
360° Stakeholder Mapping offers a systematic approach to ensuring the effective <b>participation of all stakeholders across diverse sectors.</b> Once you establish a clear catalog of stakeholder groups, you can focus on the relevant entities and individuals within each group to engage to advance specific projects. All stakeholders can then be identified and included—it's no longer overwhelming.
We have found a particular CRM software platform, Act!, to be well-suited for cataloging and accessing stakeholders by these groups and their logical subgroups. Along with IntelliSynthesis®, this essential tool and methodology enables <b>the level of collaboration and coordination needed</b> to address significant challenges.


Stakeholder engagement has often been stymied from the outset by the question, “Who are all the stakeholders?" The answer can seem indiscernible until you think out the list or catalog of stakeholder groups comprising an industrial system or a geographic area. With that framework crystalized, you can zero in on each group's relevant entities and individuals. All stakeholders can be identified and included. It’s no longer overwhelming. We have found a particular CRM software platform, Act!, to be well-suited for cataloging and accessing stakeholders by these groups and subgroups. Along with IntelliSynthesis°, OTNA shares this fundamental tool for the level of collaboration and coordination the world needs to solve its greatest challenges. 
= The How and Why of Cataloging =


360° Stakeholder Mapping is the solution for facilitating efficient participation of all stakeholders, including relevant representatives from these sectors: academia, advocacy, business, community, funders, government, labor, and media. Zeroing in on who to include from each sector for a new initiative begins with informative online research. However, the key is to dialogue with knowledgeable individuals in the industrial arena or region to learn who needs to be included.
==== Three Key Questions to Guide Your Thinking ====
Three questions to stimulate your thinking…
<ol>
# What is the ecosystem of stakeholders you want to engage to transform the results of that system?
<li>What are all the groups that constitute the involved stakeholders in the targeted arena and community?</li>
# What groups comprise all stakeholders in that arena and community?
<li>Who are the stakeholders within each group you want to involve in changing the outcomes of that system?</li>
# What group and subgroup designations enable specific conversations with the stakeholders most involved with that subject?
<li>What subgroup designations will facilitate conversations with the right stakeholders for each subject?</li></ol>
Create your groups and subgroups as you think further to meet the project’s objectives. Designate each stakeholder in multiple groups by sector, roles, and geography. Think about the ecosystem's geographic extent. Sometimes, you want to communicate with everyone in a specific county, region, state, or country or organize stakeholders into geographic teams. At other times, you may wish to convene a dialogue with all the folks who provide transportation services or work in mining, whether in the private or public sector. So, for instance, you may benefit from creating Federal, state, and local government subgroups within a public sector (uber) group. Since these people will be assigned other group designations, you can effectively convene cross-sector stakeholder gatherings around a specific subject area. 


This specificity demonstrates respect for stakeholders' time and energy, engenders trust and participation, and facilitates long-term engagement.  
=== Start with Initial Mapping ===
We typically begin mapping participants from these primary sectors: Academia, Advocacy, Business, Community, Funders, Government, Labor, and Media.


Collaboration and coordination require this method to provide relevant information to the appropriate people. Gathering input, perspectives, and commitments is magnificently efficient when you build an initiative’s stakeholder database this way. Industrial systems are for people, managed by people, and impact people. With this practical approach to stakeholder facilitation, all the right people can redesign our industrial systems.
Deciding who to include from each sector for a new initiative starts with current knowledge and online research. However, the key is to have conversations with informed individuals in the industrial sector or region to gather community input into who needs to be involved. This collaborative approach actively '''engages community and industry members as contributors to the stakeholder mapping process.''' For an example of this initial mapping, see the [[VitalRail/VitalRail Stakeholders|VitalRail 360° Stakeholder Map]].
 
=== Identify Additional Groups and Subgroups ===
Further develop your groups and subgroups while considering <b>the project's objectives and the key topics</b> that need to be discussed. Consider the ecosystem's geographic scope and the various roles stakeholders play in the arena you are working. For example, if working on a port to rail logistics system, you would catalog stakeholders as ocean carriers, port management, terminal operators, railroads, trucking companies, chassis owners, container owners, labor unions, city government, community leaders, and so forth. 
 
'''Multi-Dimensional Classification:''' Assign each stakeholder to multiple groups and subgroups based on their sector, role, and geographic location. This multidimensional approach enables flexible engagement strategies tailored to diverse needs and contexts.
 
'''Hierarchical Subgrouping:''' You might find it helpful to create subgroups within larger categories. For example, set up subgroups for federal, state, and local governments within a "Public sector" umbrella group. This hierarchy enables more precise and relevant communication.
 
'''Geographic and Industry Organization:''' Sometimes you need to communicate with everyone in a specific county, region, state, or country, or organize stakeholders into geographic teams. At other times, you may want to convene discussions with all individuals who provide specific services, such as transportation, or work in particular industries, like mining.
 
'''Cross-Sector Engagement:''' Assigning people to multiple group designations allows you to easily bring together cross-sector stakeholder discussions on specific topics. This flexibility is essential for tackling complex, multi-faceted challenges that cross traditional boundaries.
 
=== The Benefits of This Specificity ===
This level of specificity demonstrates respect for stakeholders' time and effort, fosters trust and encourages participation, and promotes long-term engagement. When stakeholders see that their involvement is focused and relevant to their skills and interests, they are more likely to participate actively and maintain their engagement over time.
 
Industrial systems are for people, managed by people, and have an impact on people. The key to large-scale collaboration and progress is engaging all relevant stakeholders within the ecosystem. Sharing and receiving input, perspectives, and commitments become highly effective when you build an initiative's participant database using 360° Stakeholder Mapping.
This practical approach to stakeholder facilitation <b>allows the right people to collaborate in redesigning our industrial systems</b>, developing solutions that genuinely serve the communities and industries they affect.

Latest revision as of 22:02, 24 November 2025

OnTrackNorthAmerica has pioneered an innovative approach to stakeholder identification and cataloging that supercharges facilitation, collaboration, and results for any challenge or opportunity. We have successfully used this methodology for over thirty years, advising on infrastructure projects across 47 U.S. states and Canadian provinces. 360° Stakeholder Mapping serves as the cornerstone of all OTNA Initiatives and IntelliConferences®.

Stakeholder engagement is often thwarted right out of the gate by the basic question, "Who are the stakeholders?" The answer can seem overwhelming until you systematically create a detailed list of stakeholder groups within an industrial system or geographic area. Without this framework, identifying all relevant parties is difficult.

360° Stakeholder Mapping offers a systematic approach to ensuring the effective participation of all stakeholders across diverse sectors. Once you establish a clear catalog of stakeholder groups, you can focus on the relevant entities and individuals within each group to engage to advance specific projects. All stakeholders can then be identified and included—it's no longer overwhelming. We have found a particular CRM software platform, Act!, to be well-suited for cataloging and accessing stakeholders by these groups and their logical subgroups. Along with IntelliSynthesis®, this essential tool and methodology enables the level of collaboration and coordination needed to address significant challenges.

The How and Why of Cataloging

Three Key Questions to Guide Your Thinking

  1. What are all the groups that constitute the involved stakeholders in the targeted arena and community?
  2. Who are the stakeholders within each group you want to involve in changing the outcomes of that system?
  3. What subgroup designations will facilitate conversations with the right stakeholders for each subject?

Start with Initial Mapping

We typically begin mapping participants from these primary sectors: Academia, Advocacy, Business, Community, Funders, Government, Labor, and Media.

Deciding who to include from each sector for a new initiative starts with current knowledge and online research. However, the key is to have conversations with informed individuals in the industrial sector or region to gather community input into who needs to be involved. This collaborative approach actively engages community and industry members as contributors to the stakeholder mapping process. For an example of this initial mapping, see the VitalRail 360° Stakeholder Map.

Identify Additional Groups and Subgroups

Further develop your groups and subgroups while considering the project's objectives and the key topics that need to be discussed. Consider the ecosystem's geographic scope and the various roles stakeholders play in the arena you are working. For example, if working on a port to rail logistics system, you would catalog stakeholders as ocean carriers, port management, terminal operators, railroads, trucking companies, chassis owners, container owners, labor unions, city government, community leaders, and so forth.

Multi-Dimensional Classification: Assign each stakeholder to multiple groups and subgroups based on their sector, role, and geographic location. This multidimensional approach enables flexible engagement strategies tailored to diverse needs and contexts.

Hierarchical Subgrouping: You might find it helpful to create subgroups within larger categories. For example, set up subgroups for federal, state, and local governments within a "Public sector" umbrella group. This hierarchy enables more precise and relevant communication.

Geographic and Industry Organization: Sometimes you need to communicate with everyone in a specific county, region, state, or country, or organize stakeholders into geographic teams. At other times, you may want to convene discussions with all individuals who provide specific services, such as transportation, or work in particular industries, like mining.

Cross-Sector Engagement: Assigning people to multiple group designations allows you to easily bring together cross-sector stakeholder discussions on specific topics. This flexibility is essential for tackling complex, multi-faceted challenges that cross traditional boundaries.

The Benefits of This Specificity

This level of specificity demonstrates respect for stakeholders' time and effort, fosters trust and encourages participation, and promotes long-term engagement. When stakeholders see that their involvement is focused and relevant to their skills and interests, they are more likely to participate actively and maintain their engagement over time.

Industrial systems are for people, managed by people, and have an impact on people. The key to large-scale collaboration and progress is engaging all relevant stakeholders within the ecosystem. Sharing and receiving input, perspectives, and commitments become highly effective when you build an initiative's participant database using 360° Stakeholder Mapping. This practical approach to stakeholder facilitation allows the right people to collaborate in redesigning our industrial systems, developing solutions that genuinely serve the communities and industries they affect.