EMIP: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
 
(71 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<h1>RE-STEM, Rail Enabled Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals</h1>The essential minerals industry in North America is at a crossroads. The efforts to re-shore and re-industrialize provide an opportunity to expand continental mineral mining and production. The industry can continue on the slow-growth path given by competition and mistrust or lead with innovative thinking that integrates environmental stewardship with industrial progress.
{{DISPLAYTITLE: EMIP: Essential Minerals Industrial Planning}}


Embracing a holistic approach of collaboration, innovation, and ethical commitment must include full lifecycle accounting and whole systems planning, including multi-modal transportation. The essential minerals industry can set a new standard that meets market demands while preserving the planet for future generations.
== Introduction ==
'''Reshoring, reindustrialization, and population growth are driving unprecedented demand for continental mineral production.''' The industry can meet this moment by integrating environmental stewardship with economic opportunity from mine to market—making efficiency and sustainability a competitive advantage. This requires whole systems planning that accounts for full lifecycle environmental and economic impacts. It also requires transportation infrastructure that leverages rail's efficiency for heavy mineral movements. This '''Essential Minerals Industrial Planning''' convenes stakeholders to plan entire mineral supply chains, including:
* Essential mineral companies;
* Mineral supply and service companies;
* Rail, truck, barge, and ocean carriers, and;
* The industries and communities they serve.


The challenges of counterproductive regulations, well-meaning environmental groups, and community resistance persist. Embracing the principles of RE-STEM will facilitate the cooperation necessary to resolve these challenges.
== The Essential Minerals IntelliConferences ==
Previously, rational idea generation and problem-solving concerning mineral production, use, and logistics have been almost impossible. Existing forums and methods for stakeholder engagement rely on competitive debate at best, creating barriers to honest communication and consensus-building. A new way for stakeholders to engage is needed.  


RE-STEM participants will inform the re-design of the essential minerals industry by balancing economic growth, environmental stewardship, and stakeholder interests.<h3>Foundational Principles</h3>
'''Essential Minerals Industrial Planning provides the forum this industry has lacked.''' The IntelliConference Series brings together mineral producers, supply and service companies, transportation providers, and affected communities to solve shared challenges through collaboration rather than competition.  


# Collaborative Industrial Optimization
=Essential Minerals Alignment IntelliConference=
# Environmental Responsibility
==Background Statement: ==
# Community Engagement
The key to progress beyond long-standing mining conflicts is establishing a shared understanding of what truly qualifies as "essential minerals." Citizens, environmental advocates, and their elected leaders will rally around a realistic essential minerals surge, if conducted consciously and respectfully of their concerns and well-being.
# Transparent Communication
# Sustainable Systems Capitalization


== Convene the Essential Minerals Sustainability IntelliConference, inviting the continent’s leading environmental and community advocacy organizations to participate. ==
==Core Question:==
=== Background Statement: ===
Which minerals are essential to support North America's decarbonization, electrification, and reindustrialization?
Existing forums and methods for stakeholder engagement rely on competitive debate at best, creating barriers to honest communication and alignment. Rational, multidimensional idea generation and problem-solving for sustainable mineral production and use is almost impossible. A new way for stakeholders to engage is needed. CAPSI provides that forum and method.


=== Core Question: ===
==Round One: Determining Essential Minerals==
What optimal volumes, locations, and design elements of essential mineral mining and processing can industry and community stakeholders, including company management, association leaders, unions, environmental organizations, and community advocacy groups agree on for a profitable and sustainable mineral mining industry?
#What factors do we apply to determining which minerals are “essential?”
#What factors do we apply to determine how much of each mineral we need and want?
#What volumes of mineral supply are needed to support the clean energy transition?
#What essential minerals are required to support North America's reshoring and reindustrialization?
#What are the current volumes of each essential mineral supply?
#What are the current locations of each essential mineral supply?
#Which minerals have been determined to have a limited supply globally and therefore need to be conserved or addressed in some way?
#Where do we need additional essential minerals and at what volumes?


<span style="color:#477F97;"><big><u>'''''Round One Dialogue Questions'''''</u></big></span>
=Essential Minerals Environmental IntelliConference=
==Background Statement==
Mineral extraction and processing require heavy industrial activity that affects natural environments and community quality of life. Balancing economic necessity with environmental stewardship requires systematic analysis of where and how we produce essential minerals. Mineral producers benefit from shorter, less contentious permitting timelines. Communities benefit from more thoughtful siting and operational practices that minimize impacts. 


# Which stakeholder groups do we want to have a voice in this IntelliConference?
==Core Question:==
# What are the continent’s “essential minerals?”
What are the full environmental and community impacts of mineral production at each step in the supply chain, and where does reducing consumption offer viable impact reduction?
## What factors do we apply to determining the “essential minerals?”
## What factors do we apply to determine how much of each essential mineral we need and want?
# What are the current volumes of each essential mineral supply?
# What are the current locations of each essential mineral supply?
# What are the supply chain components for production, processing, and consumption?
## What are the optimal volumes and locations of mineral supply to support the clean energy transition?


<span style="color:#477F97;"><big><u>'''''Round Two Dialogue Questions:'''''</u></big></span>
==Round One: Assessing Environmental Impact==
#What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are mined?
#What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are processed?
#What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are used and recycled?
#How do we best assess the environmental impacts of each step in each mineral's supply chain?
#What are the opportunities for more sustainable production of each essential mineral?
#What factors have to be addressed for mineral companies to use Best Available Technology throughout the life of the mine?
#Which minerals have been determined to have a limited supply globally and therefore need to be conserved or addressed in some way?
#When harmful environmental impacts are deemed unavoidable for a supply chain activity, how do we mitigate them?
#Which minerals are candidates for reduced production due to disproportionate environmental harm from extraction or use?
#What has to happen to accommodate reducing the consumption of individual minerals when deemed necessary?
== Round Two: Aligning with Communities ==


# How do we best assess the environmental impacts?
#What community concerns must be effectively addressed?
# What are the opportunities for conserving the use of each essential mineral?
#How can potential health risks to communities be mitigated?
# What has to happen to accommodate reducing the consumption of individual minerals when deemed beneficial to the environment?
#What steps can be taken to minimize or eliminate aesthetic degradation?
# When harmful environmental impacts are deemed unavoidable for any supply chain activities, how do we mitigate them?
#How can communities maintain their sense of "place attachment?"
# What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are mined?
#What approaches enable citizens to accurately assess risk?
# What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are processed?
#How can mining companies relate productively with communities and community leaders?
# What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are used and recycled?
##How can mineral companies increase openness and transparency?
# What steps must be taken to render anticipated environmental impacts transparent and trustworthy?
##What approaches build community support for responsible mining operations?
##What steps must be taken to communicate anticipated environmental impacts with transparency and trust?
##How can mining companies and community leaders agree on development implications and responsibilities?
##How can mining companies and community leaders develop a "Community Benefits Agreement?"
##What decision-making protocols have been used effectively?
#What steps can mitigate citizens' concerns around mine and facility closures?
=Essential Mineral Logistics IntelliConference=
==Background:==
Our current mineral supply chains in North America are inefficient, reducing profitability and sustainability, because they have been developed as independent projects with little coordination among the different stages. For an industry that requires moving large volumes of heavy materials to and from mines, processing plants, and manufacturing facilities, it is shocking how much of this movement relies on trucks. In Nevada, where mining is the second-largest industry, less than 4% of these materials are transported by rail, and less than a quarter of one percent move by rail between in-state mines and processing facilities.


<span style="color:#477F97;"><big><u>'''''Round Three Dialogue Questions:'''''</u></big></span>
==Core Question:==
What end-to-end mineral systems can stakeholders envision that maximize efficiency and profitability through strategic facility placement and intelligent material movement? 


# What community concerns have to be effectively addressed?
==Round One: Assessing Production and Marketplace Logistics ==
## What are the environmental risks of mineral mining?
#For which minerals are we aiming to improve logistics?
## What are the degrees of risk between varying mineral mines?
#What volume and location data on the relevant mineral production is available and helpful to our thinking?
## How can potential health risks to communities be mitigated?
#What volume and location data on the relevant mineral consumption is available and helpful to our thinking?
## What steps must be taken to increase the community's trust in mining companies?
#What level of GIS mapping of the facilities and data would be helpful?
## What steps can be taken to protect against esthetic degradation?
#What are the volumes and locations of each essential mineral supply chain component for production, processing, and consumption?
## How can communities maintain a sense of place attachment?
#What share of mineral transportation moves by truck versus rail, and what are the volumes?
## What steps can be taken to mitigate citizens' concerns for their community when the mine is closed?
#What logistics services are provided to the components of the essential minerals supply chains?
## What steps need to be taken for mining companies to improve relationships with communities?
##What are the gaps and shortcomings of these services?
# What strategies promote the acceptance of new mines?
#What concerns for the transportation of minerals, ores, and products must be addressed?
# Which issues must be addressed to align the interests of mining companies and communities?
#What new mining, production, and processing locations are in construction or on the drawing board?
## How does NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) sentiment affect mining?
#What role can location play, both of individual mines and facilities, and their relation to each other, in creating efficient mineral supply chains?
## What are the challenges posed by uninformed citizens?
#What areas of the market for sourcing or distributing minerals are challenging to access due to logistics dynamics?
## What steps can be taken to mitigate citizens' propensity to overestimate risk?
#What industrial growth opportunities from re-shoring and reindustrialization need specific transportation improvements?
## How can the media contribute to a more accurate and positive image of mining?
#What market expansion opportunities would benefit from logistics improvements?
## How can citizens orient their motivations to support the greater good instead of narrow self-interests?
#Which import opportunities need new logistics approaches?
## How can citizens’ trust in governments and private enterprises be expanded?
#Which export opportunities need new logistics approaches?
==Round Two: Redesigning Production and Marketplace Logistics ==
#How can we address the needed transportation logistics improvements?
=Essential Minerals Regulatory Excellence IntelliConference=
==Background Statement==
Regulations and permitting processes have evolved incrementally over decades, often without adequate coordination among public and private stakeholders. The result is a framework that can impede both environmental protection and legitimate industrial development. Smarter, more collaborative approaches to regulation can better serve public interests while enabling responsible mineral production.


<span style="color:#477F97;"><big><u>'''''Round Four Dialogue Questions:'''''</u></big></span>
==Core Question:==
Which regulations governing essential mineral production are outdated, redundant, or counterproductive, and how can they be improved or replaced to better protect public safety while enabling responsible development?


# What steps can be taken to ensure the final decision is “fair” for the community and mine developers?
==Round One: Policy and Regulation==
# How can mining companies commit to projects that use Best Available Technology throughout the life of the mine?
#Which federal laws regulate mining?
# What environmental regulations on essential mineral supply chain activities must be improved or eliminated?
#Which federal agencies might be enrolled in participating and supporting this initiative?
# How can the community's initial awareness of mining activity be communicated?
#Which state and local agencies might be enrolled in participating and supporting this initiative?
## Switch from DAD (decide, announce, defend) to ADD (announce, discuss, decide)
#What are the concerns of the government agencies that interact with the mineral industry?
## Community-oriented mining increases domestic participation in the global mining boom and ensures equitable and resilient supply chains.
#What policy and regulatory issues are essential mineral companies concerned with?
## Shifting from fossil fuel-based energy to materials-based energy will allow North America to progress toward sustainability.
#What policy solutions will support the development of increased processing capacity?
## Materials-based energy requires less drilling than fossil-fuel energy.
#What industry practices do regulatory agencies seek to strengthen?
## Resisting mineral mining in the U.S. extends our dependence on China.
#What antitrust and other laws and regulations must be amended to accommodate more robust collaboration with and among the private sector?
# What steps can be taken to ensure citizens are educated on mineral mining?
#What regulations governing essential mineral supply chains need to be improved, replaced, or eliminated, and how?
# What is the most effective way to communicate this education?
#How can permitting processes be streamlined while maintaining environmental and safety protections?
## We rely on minerals for almost every aspect of modern life
=Essential Minerals Capitalization IntelliConference=
## China currently holds a near-monopoly on mining and processing
==Background:==
## Shipping minerals by sea negatively impacts the environment, negating the benefits of products made with minerals, such as electric car batteries and wind turbines.
New opportunities for mineral businesses to expand their operations will result from these new supply chain efficiencies, improved relations with communities and government. These improvements create systematic investment opportunities that can attract substantial private capital.   
## Mining for coal occurs at the surface, leaving large scars on the land, while mining for minerals occurs at a further depth in the earth, leaving less visible effects.
## Show pictures of past successful projects
## Communicate safety records
# How can socioeconomic gains be communicated to communities?
## Mining is the first link in production chains
## Mineral wealth could provide development prospects
## Mining can be considered a cultural identity
# How can mining companies involve community leaders in decision-making?
## increase public trust
## Participation and community involvement persuasion skills are more effective than economic compensation.
# How can mining companies allow community participation?
## Allow diverse stakeholders to recognize the legitimacy of different perspectives.
## Promotes feelings of autonomy and self-determination
# How can mining companies informally communicate with communities?
## Informal processes take time but are more effective than formal consultations
# How can mining companies increase openness and transparency?
# How can risk be communicated effectively and efficiently?
## Avoiding conversations about objective risks, no matter how small, may contribute to community members' overestimation of risk.
## The average person is terrible at accurately assessing risk.  Many logical fallacies and cognitive biases are behind these distortions and must be acknowledged and addressed.
### Generalizing: Making a broad generalization based on insufficient evidence where a sweeping conclusion is drawn from a limited sample that is too small to support it. “All mining is dangerous,” and “All mining pollutes the air and water.”
### Ambiguity Bias: The tendency to avoid options that lead to an unpredictable outcome, perhaps because of insufficient data. This bias causes people to prioritize a known option over an option with an unclear outcome. Risks should always be explained using real-life examples, plastic illustrations, and not just abstract terminology.
### Conservatism Regressive Bias: A pronounced leaning towards overestimating high probabilities and underestimating lower probabilities. When assessing risks, bigger risks are overestimated at the potential cost of neglecting the smaller risks.
### Framing Effect: People tend to draw different conclusions from the same base data, depending on how and by whom they were presented. This means that the presentation of information can influence the recipient's behavior.
### Neglect of Probability: Tendency to completely disregard probabilities when a decision concerning an unknown situation has to be made. Neglect of probability usually appears in emotionally charged situations.
### The proof-seeking fallacy: Asking for 100% proof is asking for the impossible. All we can do is weigh the full body of evidence. Safety can never be proven with absolute certainty.
### Zero-risk bias: Tendency to prefer the complete elimination of risk in a sub-part over alternatives with greater overall risk reduction. It often manifests when decision-makers address health, safety, and environmental problems.
# What steps can mine companies take to acknowledge citizen’s concerns as valid?
# What community demographics should be considered?
## Rural?
## Community History?
## Conservative/Liberal?
# What moral values should be considered in communities?
## The Moral Foundations Theory:
### Moral Foundations are 5“Intuitive ethics.”
#### Care
#### Fairness
#### Loyalty
#### Authority
#### Purity
## Opposition to mining and NIMBYism is an emotional response and thus must be addressed by considering how people relate to their moral ethics.
## Liberals and Conservatives value morals with varying intensity.  Liberals focus on the first two moral foundations, while conservatives value all five more equally.
# What steps can mining companies take to engage with all moral foundations?
## Care
### Conservatives reserve care for those who have sacrificed for the group.  It can be activated by portraying a mine as a sacrifice for the country's greater good
### Signal words: Generous, selfless, devoted
## Fairness
### Conservatives value rewards in proportion to contribution.  It can be activated by providing economic or other incentives for the community's contribution to hosting the mine.
### Signal words: Equitable, righteous, virtuous, honor
## Loyalty
### Group cohesion is used to achieve success in conflict between two groups and determine who is part of the team and who is a traitor.  Can be activated by portraying mine developers and community members as part of the same team, collaborating on mutually beneficial goals.
### Signal words: Trust, duty, tried and true, staunch, faithful, dedicated, dependable
## Authority
### Respect for hierarchical relationships can be activated by acknowledging the authority of community leaders and taking a submissive role in certain situations.
### Signal words: Respect, lead, esteem, reverence
## Purity
### The idea that a person, place, or object can be sacred and, therefore, polluted or contaminated can be activated by recognizing the significance of local land and portraying respect and intent to keep the sacredness intact.
### Signal words: Purified, clean, clarified, pure, unadulterated, uncorrupted, refined, rendered
# How can mining companies and community leaders agree on early impact planning and mitigation?
## Where the mining company is responsible for…
## Infrastructure upgrades
## Increase demand for public services
### School enrollment
### Hospitality
### Medical Services
### Recreation sites
### Public Lands
## Increased traffic puts pressure on transportation infrastructure
## Increased population from construction
## The strain on the housing market
# How can mining companies and community leaders agree on a Community Benefits Agreement?
## CBAs should stay with the project, not the developer
## Companies should act as if consent to land is required, even if it isn’t by law.
## Ability to negotiate for and secure lasting benefits from new mines
## Ensure shared economic development
## Consider what communities want when the mine closes
## Place-based opportunities
### Infrastructure improvements
### Local procurement provisions
### Minimum local hire thresholds
### Workforce training
### Programs that build community capacity/resilience long-term


== Convene the Essential Minerals Sustainability IntelliConference, inviting the continent’s governmental agencies to participate. ==
==Core Question:==
What is the optimal approach to the deployment of new investment capital for essential minerals infrastructure, operations, and growth from these supply chain improvements?


=== Background Statement: ===
== Round One: Current State & Barriers ==
Regulations and permitting processes evolve over time among public- and private-sector actors with low levels of trust, free-flowing engagement, and commercial sensibility. Consequently, both public interests and private sector progress are hindered. A new approach for updating the regulatory and planning framework for the essential minerals supply chain is needed.


=== Core Question: ===
# How do Wall Street and private equity investors currently view the mineral industry?
What regulations can stakeholders agree on that are either outdated, de minimis, redundant, counterproductive, or can be improved or replaced in support of the growth and safety of essential mineral production and delivery?<h2>Round One Dialogue Questions:</h2>
# What barriers currently prevent adequate capital investment in essential mineral supply chains?
# What specific risk factors make mineral projects difficult to finance under current conditions?


== Round Two: Investor Requirements & Perspectives ==


<h3>Which federal agencies might be enrolled in participating and supporting RE-STEM?</h3>
# What return profiles, timelines, and risk parameters do different types of investors require?
# What ESG criteria do institutional investors apply to mineral sector investments?
# What level of transparency and data do investors need to commit capital?


== Round Three: Capital Needs by Type ==


<h4>Environmental Protection Agency</h4>
# What are the distinct capital needs for mining operations, processing facilities, and transportation infrastructure?
# Which elements of the essential minerals supply chain need equity investment versus debt financing?
# What infrastructure investments require public-private partnerships or government support?
# What role can rail infrastructure investment play in enabling mineral supply chain efficiency?


== Round Four: Opportunity Assessment ==


<h4>U.S. Department of Labor Mining Safety and Health Administration</h4>
# What commercial and economic development opportunities emerge from integrated mineral supply chain planning?
# What opportunities for expanded investment does whole-systems redesign generate?
# What new market opportunities justify capital deployment in mineral supply chains?


== Round Five: Risk Mitigation & Returns ==


<h4>U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management </h4>
# How does the whole-systems approach reduce investment risk compared to isolated projects?
# How do improved community relations and streamlined permitting affect project bankability?
# What exit strategies and liquidity options exist for different types of mineral sector investments?
# What mechanisms and structures can ensure reliable returns for infrastructure investors?


== Round Six: Measurement & Execution ==


<h4>U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service </h4>
# What goals and measures are needed to support the capitalization of these opportunities?
 
# What financial modeling and projection tools would help investors evaluate systematic mineral supply chain investments?
 
# How can stakeholders create investment-grade project documentation that meets institutional capital requirements?
<h4>U.S. Department of Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement</h4>
 
 
<h4>Division of Mineral Resources </h4>
 
 
<h4>U.S. Department of Energy</h4>
 
 
<h3>What federal laws regulate mining? </h3>
 
 
<h4>National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)</h4>
 
 
<h4>Clean Air Act (CAA)</h4>
 
 
<h4>Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)</h4>
 
 
<h4>Clean Water Act (CWA)</h4>
 
 
<h4>Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)</h4>
 
 
<h4>Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)</h4>
 
 
<h3>Which state and local agencies might be enrolled in participating and supporting this development? </h3>
 
 
<h4>State Surface Mining Commissions</h4>
 
 
<h4>State Bureau of Mines and Geology Departments </h4>
 
 
<h4>State Departments of Natural Resources</h4>
 
 
<h3>What is the nature of the relationships with the relevant government agencies?</h3>
 
 
<h4>It relates well with the Western States Congressional and Senate Coalition, Chris is on the advisory committee of the Western States Caucus Foundation </h4>
 
 
<h3>What are the concerns of the government agencies that encounter the mineral industry? </h3>
 
 
<h3>What is EMA’s standing/posture/relations with our federal government?</h3>
 
 
<h4>EMA team is solid and capable, relate well with Congress, </h4>
 
 
<h2>Round Two Dialogue Questions</h2>
 
 
<h3>What policy and regulatory issues are the Essential Minerals Association and its members concerned with?</h3>
 
 
<h4>Clean Energy Reform Act</h4>
 
 
<h4>The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act reaffirms decades of mining law and precedent and provides certainty for America's mineral producers. </h4>
 
 
<h3>What policy solutions will support the development of increased processing capacity?</h3>
 
 
<h4>https://fas.org/publication/critical-thinking-on-critical-minerals/</h4>
 
 
<h3>How can government agencies and the Essential Minerals Association agree on regulatory legislation? </h3>
 
 
<h3>How can government agencies improve mining permit inefficiencies? </h3>
 
 
<h4>NEPA</h4>
 
 
<h4>Improved Jurisdictional Coordination</h4>
 
 
<h4>Uniform Interagency Approach</h4>
 
 
<h4>Adequate Staffing and Specialized Talent</h4>
 
 
<h4>https://natlawreview.com/article/permitting-reform-united-states</h4>

Latest revision as of 17:00, 16 December 2025


Introduction

Reshoring, reindustrialization, and population growth are driving unprecedented demand for continental mineral production. The industry can meet this moment by integrating environmental stewardship with economic opportunity from mine to market—making efficiency and sustainability a competitive advantage. This requires whole systems planning that accounts for full lifecycle environmental and economic impacts. It also requires transportation infrastructure that leverages rail's efficiency for heavy mineral movements. This Essential Minerals Industrial Planning convenes stakeholders to plan entire mineral supply chains, including:

  • Essential mineral companies;
  • Mineral supply and service companies;
  • Rail, truck, barge, and ocean carriers, and;
  • The industries and communities they serve.

The Essential Minerals IntelliConferences

Previously, rational idea generation and problem-solving concerning mineral production, use, and logistics have been almost impossible. Existing forums and methods for stakeholder engagement rely on competitive debate at best, creating barriers to honest communication and consensus-building. A new way for stakeholders to engage is needed.

Essential Minerals Industrial Planning provides the forum this industry has lacked. The IntelliConference Series brings together mineral producers, supply and service companies, transportation providers, and affected communities to solve shared challenges through collaboration rather than competition.

Essential Minerals Alignment IntelliConference

Background Statement:

The key to progress beyond long-standing mining conflicts is establishing a shared understanding of what truly qualifies as "essential minerals." Citizens, environmental advocates, and their elected leaders will rally around a realistic essential minerals surge, if conducted consciously and respectfully of their concerns and well-being.

Core Question:

Which minerals are essential to support North America's decarbonization, electrification, and reindustrialization?

Round One: Determining Essential Minerals

  1. What factors do we apply to determining which minerals are “essential?”
  2. What factors do we apply to determine how much of each mineral we need and want?
  3. What volumes of mineral supply are needed to support the clean energy transition?
  4. What essential minerals are required to support North America's reshoring and reindustrialization?
  5. What are the current volumes of each essential mineral supply?
  6. What are the current locations of each essential mineral supply?
  7. Which minerals have been determined to have a limited supply globally and therefore need to be conserved or addressed in some way?
  8. Where do we need additional essential minerals and at what volumes?

Essential Minerals Environmental IntelliConference

Background Statement

Mineral extraction and processing require heavy industrial activity that affects natural environments and community quality of life. Balancing economic necessity with environmental stewardship requires systematic analysis of where and how we produce essential minerals. Mineral producers benefit from shorter, less contentious permitting timelines. Communities benefit from more thoughtful siting and operational practices that minimize impacts.

Core Question:

What are the full environmental and community impacts of mineral production at each step in the supply chain, and where does reducing consumption offer viable impact reduction?

Round One: Assessing Environmental Impact

  1. What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are mined?
  2. What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are processed?
  3. What environmental concerns do we want to address in how minerals are used and recycled?
  4. How do we best assess the environmental impacts of each step in each mineral's supply chain?
  5. What are the opportunities for more sustainable production of each essential mineral?
  6. What factors have to be addressed for mineral companies to use Best Available Technology throughout the life of the mine?
  7. Which minerals have been determined to have a limited supply globally and therefore need to be conserved or addressed in some way?
  8. When harmful environmental impacts are deemed unavoidable for a supply chain activity, how do we mitigate them?
  9. Which minerals are candidates for reduced production due to disproportionate environmental harm from extraction or use?
  10. What has to happen to accommodate reducing the consumption of individual minerals when deemed necessary?

Round Two: Aligning with Communities

  1. What community concerns must be effectively addressed?
  2. How can potential health risks to communities be mitigated?
  3. What steps can be taken to minimize or eliminate aesthetic degradation?
  4. How can communities maintain their sense of "place attachment?"
  5. What approaches enable citizens to accurately assess risk?
  6. How can mining companies relate productively with communities and community leaders?
    1. How can mineral companies increase openness and transparency?
    2. What approaches build community support for responsible mining operations?
    3. What steps must be taken to communicate anticipated environmental impacts with transparency and trust?
    4. How can mining companies and community leaders agree on development implications and responsibilities?
    5. How can mining companies and community leaders develop a "Community Benefits Agreement?"
    6. What decision-making protocols have been used effectively?
  7. What steps can mitigate citizens' concerns around mine and facility closures?

Essential Mineral Logistics IntelliConference

Background:

Our current mineral supply chains in North America are inefficient, reducing profitability and sustainability, because they have been developed as independent projects with little coordination among the different stages. For an industry that requires moving large volumes of heavy materials to and from mines, processing plants, and manufacturing facilities, it is shocking how much of this movement relies on trucks. In Nevada, where mining is the second-largest industry, less than 4% of these materials are transported by rail, and less than a quarter of one percent move by rail between in-state mines and processing facilities.

Core Question:

What end-to-end mineral systems can stakeholders envision that maximize efficiency and profitability through strategic facility placement and intelligent material movement? 

Round One: Assessing Production and Marketplace Logistics

  1. For which minerals are we aiming to improve logistics?
  2. What volume and location data on the relevant mineral production is available and helpful to our thinking?
  3. What volume and location data on the relevant mineral consumption is available and helpful to our thinking?
  4. What level of GIS mapping of the facilities and data would be helpful?
  5. What are the volumes and locations of each essential mineral supply chain component for production, processing, and consumption?
  6. What share of mineral transportation moves by truck versus rail, and what are the volumes?
  7. What logistics services are provided to the components of the essential minerals supply chains?
    1. What are the gaps and shortcomings of these services?
  8. What concerns for the transportation of minerals, ores, and products must be addressed?
  9. What new mining, production, and processing locations are in construction or on the drawing board?
  10. What role can location play, both of individual mines and facilities, and their relation to each other, in creating efficient mineral supply chains?
  11. What areas of the market for sourcing or distributing minerals are challenging to access due to logistics dynamics?
  12. What industrial growth opportunities from re-shoring and reindustrialization need specific transportation improvements?
  13. What market expansion opportunities would benefit from logistics improvements?
  14. Which import opportunities need new logistics approaches?
  15. Which export opportunities need new logistics approaches?

Round Two: Redesigning Production and Marketplace Logistics

  1. How can we address the needed transportation logistics improvements?

Essential Minerals Regulatory Excellence IntelliConference

Background Statement

Regulations and permitting processes have evolved incrementally over decades, often without adequate coordination among public and private stakeholders. The result is a framework that can impede both environmental protection and legitimate industrial development. Smarter, more collaborative approaches to regulation can better serve public interests while enabling responsible mineral production.

Core Question:

Which regulations governing essential mineral production are outdated, redundant, or counterproductive, and how can they be improved or replaced to better protect public safety while enabling responsible development?

Round One: Policy and Regulation

  1. Which federal laws regulate mining?
  2. Which federal agencies might be enrolled in participating and supporting this initiative?
  3. Which state and local agencies might be enrolled in participating and supporting this initiative?
  4. What are the concerns of the government agencies that interact with the mineral industry?
  5. What policy and regulatory issues are essential mineral companies concerned with?
  6. What policy solutions will support the development of increased processing capacity?
  7. What industry practices do regulatory agencies seek to strengthen?
  8. What antitrust and other laws and regulations must be amended to accommodate more robust collaboration with and among the private sector?
  9. What regulations governing essential mineral supply chains need to be improved, replaced, or eliminated, and how?
  10. How can permitting processes be streamlined while maintaining environmental and safety protections?

Essential Minerals Capitalization IntelliConference

Background:

New opportunities for mineral businesses to expand their operations will result from these new supply chain efficiencies, improved relations with communities and government. These improvements create systematic investment opportunities that can attract substantial private capital.

Core Question:

What is the optimal approach to the deployment of new investment capital for essential minerals infrastructure, operations, and growth from these supply chain improvements?

Round One: Current State & Barriers

  1. How do Wall Street and private equity investors currently view the mineral industry?
  2. What barriers currently prevent adequate capital investment in essential mineral supply chains?
  3. What specific risk factors make mineral projects difficult to finance under current conditions?

Round Two: Investor Requirements & Perspectives

  1. What return profiles, timelines, and risk parameters do different types of investors require?
  2. What ESG criteria do institutional investors apply to mineral sector investments?
  3. What level of transparency and data do investors need to commit capital?

Round Three: Capital Needs by Type

  1. What are the distinct capital needs for mining operations, processing facilities, and transportation infrastructure?
  2. Which elements of the essential minerals supply chain need equity investment versus debt financing?
  3. What infrastructure investments require public-private partnerships or government support?
  4. What role can rail infrastructure investment play in enabling mineral supply chain efficiency?

Round Four: Opportunity Assessment

  1. What commercial and economic development opportunities emerge from integrated mineral supply chain planning?
  2. What opportunities for expanded investment does whole-systems redesign generate?
  3. What new market opportunities justify capital deployment in mineral supply chains?

Round Five: Risk Mitigation & Returns

  1. How does the whole-systems approach reduce investment risk compared to isolated projects?
  2. How do improved community relations and streamlined permitting affect project bankability?
  3. What exit strategies and liquidity options exist for different types of mineral sector investments?
  4. What mechanisms and structures can ensure reliable returns for infrastructure investors?

Round Six: Measurement & Execution

  1. What goals and measures are needed to support the capitalization of these opportunities?
  2. What financial modeling and projection tools would help investors evaluate systematic mineral supply chain investments?
  3. How can stakeholders create investment-grade project documentation that meets institutional capital requirements?
Retrieved from "https://ontracknorthamerica.org/index.php?title=EMIP&oldid=7977"