Sandbox 2

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
Revision as of 18:52, 11 June 2024 by Ladaniels (talk | contribs) (Created page with " = “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” Buckminster Fuller = = An Action Plan for Rail Industry Growth in Service to All Stakeholders = = Half-page SRF Background and half-page OTNA Background = = RE-SEED, Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development = = Why is now the time for a comprehensive freight rail growth strategy? = == Environmental iss...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” Buckminster Fuller

An Action Plan for Rail Industry Growth in Service to All Stakeholders

Half-page SRF Background and half-page OTNA Background

RE-SEED, Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development

Why is now the time for a comprehensive freight rail growth strategy?

Environmental issues, increasing road congestion and costs, and battered public sector budgets present an opportune time for railroads to align their business models with the continent's best interests.

Railroads are vital to North America’s economic growth and environmental stability. Railroads are:

Environmentally efficient

Capital efficient

Space efficient

Railroads in North America are a $100 billion-a-year industry, while trucking is a $1 trillion-a-year industry. The growth opportunity for rail is immense.

Investors, infrastructure funds, and shippers will provide ample capital for this growth strategy, which aligns with the urgent need for sustainable supply chains worldwide.

Projects, companies, communities, and investors will enjoy a higher return on investment as part of a growing rail industry.

Why does the rail industry need a new approach? (All solvable!)

It is content with long-term incremental growth while losing market share with no discernable industry-wide growth strategy.

Given railroads' inherent contribution to addressing public sector concerns, it has a mismatched approach to government relations.

It has a defensive approach to community relations that misses the opportunity to inspire a groundswell of support for railroads.

It has a weak relationship with capital providers compared to industries with less resilience, importance, and opportunity.

It is slow to adopt new technologies or technologies proven effective outside North America.

It has not been facile at the level of collaboration needed to work effectively with other critical stakeholder groups.

It has suffered from labor-management relations that are hurtful to all sides.

More than 90% of industrial properties are developed as truck-served only.

Landowners, developers, and shippers are challenged to address the complexity of rail logistics and infrastructure.

Borrowing the required capital for rail infrastructure is more challenging than land and facilities.

Many economic development agencies are inadequately trained in rail-enabled economic development.

Despite its inherent efficiencies, it is not reaching its potential for leading the continent to freight system sustainability.

What new approaches will forward growth?

After years of losing market share to trucks, railroads now have an enormous opportunity to recapture volume and drive meaningful growth if they adopt a comprehensive growth strategy.

Better government relations will drive additional public sector investment in railroads, and supportive policies.

The key is collaboration and letting go of the outdated expectation that competition is an appropriate driver of commerce and governance.

Rail projects will attract more investment when thoughtfully conceived to support entire supply chains and industrial systems.

Adopting new technologies, or those proven effective overseas will bring innovation, safety improvements, and productivity gains to North American railroads.

Building positive relationships with shippers, carriers, governments, and other stakeholders will deliver enormous benefits and open new growth paths.

More collaborative and positive approaches to labor management will attract thousands of new workers, offsetting retirements in a difficult hiring market.

Railroads are an efficient and cost-effective way to move freight.  Changing the way railroads do business will help everyone achieve their sustainability goals.

What stakeholder groups do we want contributing to the intelligence and progress of RE-SEED?

What are the stakeholder sectors that comprise do we catalog stakeholder groups into?

Government

Industry

Advocacy

Labor

Academia

Industry media

Community representatives

Business-service providers, manufacturers, suppliers, Advisors, landowners, developers

Commerce-shippers, local businesses

What has OnTrackNorthAmerica positioned to accelerate this growth?

Regional and corridor infrastructure planning, AutoDesk

Statewide and multi-state freight and rail planning, AECOM

State Freight Advisory Committees

IntelliSynthesis

North American Freight Forum-what technology company, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, go thru Matt Rose or Gil Lamphere, Act

Unparalleled cataloging of 30,000 relevant stakeholders across the industrial, political, and geographic landscape

What has Strategic Rail Finance positioned to accelerate RE-SEED?

Collaborative Industrial Optimization

GIS-Enabled way of thinking and designing sustainable industry and communities

Applied economic and demographic data analysis  

How proper investment leads to multiple growth opportunities

OnTrack Industrial Properties Project

Collateral and Financial Engineering

Strategic Rail Bank, guy in Nevada, Jeff Steilgelman

Strategic Rail Fund, Bon French, Macquarie

Rail Customer Funding

What relations

Amit conversation

A commercially-viable, sustainable industrial systems approach.

How should we relate to how our dialogue needs to be kept quiet?

Who would you suggest we interact with?

We are inventing new designs in the fundamental game pieces of the relationship among government agencies, businesses, academia, researchers, and consulting firms. That is the RFQs, RFIs, RFPs, Proposals, Contracts, Work Scopes, Reports, Action Plans.

What is the ideal use that we want the datahub to fulfill

If we have this geospatial continental hub that aggregates information, within that we would be abel to reun analysis as to where

Improve rail

Identity and design network expansion

Design industrial systems

waste  

What are the ability factors of various user groups that we want to design our tool and training program to address?

What are the continent’s natural resources that we want to map?

How are we going to do that?

How has data been gathered to date by the relevant stakeholder groups?

What assistance can be provided to early stage data sufferers so that they can bring their data system into optimal alignment with this initiative?

What level of governments are best involved with the aggregation for each geo-level of data?

What are the time factors for each step in this initiative?

What data format would make the process of gathering data from

What key industrial systems in the state are most important to map?

What is the current state of GIS Data gathering in each county?

Topics, subjects, phrases

You think and write in questions, and in order?

How can RE-SEED assist government in addressing policy shortcomings?   

Retrieved from "https://ontracknorthamerica.org/index.php?title=Sandbox_2&oldid=2145"