Continental Action Plan for Sustainable Industry: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
== What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?== | == What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?== | ||
==== Local ==== | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential''</h6></span> | |||
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;"> | |||
<li>OnTrackPhiladelphia</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span> | |||
==== Corridor ==== | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential''</h6></span> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development'' </h6></span> | |||
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;"> | |||
<li>Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy</li> | |||
<li>San Francisco Bay to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span> | |||
==== State/Province ==== | |||
{{CollapseState}} | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span> | |||
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;"> | |||
<li>OnTrackNevada</li> | |||
<li>OnTrackPennsylvania</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span> | |||
====Regional/Multi-state==== | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential'' </h6></span> | |||
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;"> | |||
<li>Southeast Supply Chain Coalition</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span> | |||
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;"> | |||
<li>Southwest Supply Chain Coalition</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span> | |||
==== National ==== | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''Potential''</h6></span> | |||
<ul style = "padding-left:4em;"> | |||
<li>OnTrackMexico</li> | |||
<li>OnTrackCanada</li> | |||
<li>OnTrackUS</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Development''</h6></span> | |||
<span style = "text-indent:3em;"><h6>''In Action''</h6></span> | |||
==== Continental ==== | |||
* OnTrackNorthAmerica | |||
==How must capital deployment evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?== | ==How must capital deployment evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?== |
Revision as of 16:17, 20 November 2024
Which industrial systems must be redesigned for sustainability?
Natural Resources
- Water
- Air
- Land
- FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy
- RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment
Transportation
- Rail
- Truck
- Air
- Ports
- Ocean
- River Barge
- Pipelines
Agriculture
- Inputs
- Land use
- Soil
- Water
- Enhancements
- Processing
- Outputs
- Food
- Energy
- Biomass
Forestry
- North American Sustainable Forestry Business Plan
- Wood
- Pulp
- Paper
Mining
- Minerals
- Metals
- Coal
- Oil and Gas
Manufacturing
- Metals
- Chemicals
- Equipment
- Textiles
Materials
- Containers and Packaging
- Construction Materials
- Cement and Aggregates
- RE-CARD, Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
- Refractory
- Lumber
- Cement and Aggregates
- Metals
- Plastics
- Paper
Construction
- Factories
- Warehouses
- Powerplants
- Mechanical and structural components
Energy
- RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
Waste
- Industrial
- Commercial
- Municipal
- Glass
- RE-GLASS, Rail Enabled Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
- Glass
- Construction and demolition waste
- Agricultural
- Wood waste
What are the design criteria for CAPSI?
What do stakeholders want to add to the CAPSI Ethics and Principles?
What Goals do stakeholders want to set?
What Planning Protocols do stakeholders agree on?
What Outcomes do stakeholders envision?
- What outcomes do we want for the environment?
- What outcomes do we want for citizens?
- What outcomes do we want for business owners?
- What outcomes do we want for investors?
- What resources does society need and want to optimize?
- What goods does society need and want to have available?
What Measures of progress do stakeholders want to apply?
What is the timeline for CAPSI?
January 2025 - Selected stakeholder review
April 22, 2025 - CAPSI public launch
May 2025 - RE-SEED Launch (Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development)
April 2026 - Continental Agreement on Principles, Goals, Protocols, and Outcomes
April 2027 - All CAPSI Industrial Systems Initiatives in gear
How must planning evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?
What benefits do stakeholders want Collaborative Industrial Optimization to deliver?
How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
How do we want private-sector commercial activity to align with sustainable industrial systems?
How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
How do we want transportation planning to evolve in support of sustainable industrial systems?
How can academic and commercial research support sustainable industrial systems?
What factors do we want to include in assessing the full impact of industrial systems?
How must interactions among public and private sector entities evolve to support systemwide sustainability?
What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?
Local
Potential
- OnTrackPhiladelphia
In Development
In Action
Corridor
Potential
In Development
- Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy
- San Francisco Bay to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy
In Action
State/Province
Potential
Alberta |
British Columbia |
Manitoba |
New Brunswick |
Newfoundland and Labrador |
Northwest Territories |
Nova Scotia |
Nunavut |
Ontario |
Prince Edward Island |
Quebec |
Saskatchewan |
Yukon |
Alabama |
Alaska |
Arizona |
Arkansas |
California |
Colorado |
Connecticut |
Delaware |
Florida |
Georgia |
Hawaii |
Idaho |
Illinois |
Indiana |
Iowa |
Kansas |
Kentucky |
Louisiana |
Maine |
Maryland |
Massachusetts |
Michigan |
Minnesota |
Mississippi |
Missouri |
Montana |
Nebraska |
Nevada |
New Hampshire |
New Jersey |
New Mexico |
New York |
North Carolina |
North Dakota |
Ohio |
Oklahoma |
Oregon |
Pennsylvania |
Rhode Island |
South Carolina |
South Dakota |
Tennessee |
Texas |
Utah |
Vermont |
Virginia |
Washington |
West Virginia |
Wisconsin |
Wyoming |
Aguascalientes |
Baja California |
Baja California Sur |
Campeche |
Chiapas |
Chihuahua |
Coahuila |
Colima |
Durango |
Guanajuato |
Guerrero |
Hidalgo |
Jalisco |
México |
México City |
Michoacán |
Morelos |
Nayarit |
Nuevo León |
Puebla |
Oaxaca |
Querétaro |
Quintana Roo |
San Luis Potosí |
Sinaloa |
Sonora |
Tabasco |
Tamaulipas |
Tlaxcala |
Veracruz |
Yucatán |
Zacatecas |
In Development
- OnTrackNevada
- OnTrackPennsylvania
In Action
Regional/Multi-state
Potential
- Southeast Supply Chain Coalition
In Development
- Southwest Supply Chain Coalition
In Action
National
Potential
- OnTrackMexico
- OnTrackCanada
- OnTrackUS
In Development
In Action
Continental
- OnTrackNorthAmerica
How must capital deployment evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?
How do we want investors’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
How do we want business stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?
What advantages will Sustainable Systems Capitalization deliver?