Formatter Testing: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://wiki.ontracknorthamerica.org/index.php/Special:Search test]
== [[What industrial systems must be redesigned for sustainability?]] ==
<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>The OnTrackNorthAmerica </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
==== Natural Resources ====
</b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>Promise, </b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>Principles</b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>, </b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>Ethics, </b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>and </b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>Sustainability </b></span><span style=color:#ED7D31;><b>Commitment</b></span></br>
* Water
* Air
* Minerals
** [[RE-STEM, Rail Enabled Sustainable Transportation of Essential Minerals]]
* Land
** [[FTLUS, Freight Transportation Land Use Strategy]]
** [[RE-BAR, Rail Enabled Brownfield Asset Redevelopment]]
* Forests
** [[RE-FOREST, Rail Enabled Forest-to-Market Systems]]


<span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>Promise Statement</b></u></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b> and You</b></u></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>r </b></u></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>Invi</b></u></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>tation </b></u></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>to the Team</b></u></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>
==== Agriculture ====
</b></u></span>OnTrackNorthAmerica promises to co-lead society in redesigning its industrial systems to support sustainable life for all. You are invited to the team.  </br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
* Inputs
</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>Principles for Collaboration</b></u></span></br>
** Land use
** Soil
** Water
** Enhancements
* Outputs
** Food
** Energy
** Biomass
* Processing


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Lead from Community</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
==== Materials ====
</b></span>When co-leadership with the community is working, leaders do what it takes to be trusted to advance the greatest good. Initiatives succeed when strong leadership stands for results and represents the community’s best interests.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Assume Responsibility </b></span></br>
* Paper
* Steel
* Packaging
* Construction materials
** Lumber
** Aggregates
** Cement
*** RE-CARD, Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
** Refractory
* Plastics


We are called to be responsible for the quality of our relationships. We focus on sharing the best in ourselves while recognizing the perspectives and strengths of others.<b> </b>In each conversation, we relate in ways that advance mutual learning and progress.</br>
==== Energy ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Thrive at Our Learning Edge</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
* RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution
</b></span>Producing the results we stand for requires us to work at our learning edge. Change outside requires some change inside. What we are doing is unprecedented, and we’re constantly being trained. Bring it on! </br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Engage in Integrative </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Dialogue</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b> </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
==== Waste ====
</b></span>Integrative dialogue transcends conventional debate, where either/or and right/wrong interactions marginalize many valuable perspectives. Especially when seemingly opposing points of view are expressed, we work together to synergize new understandings. </br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Articulate Questions</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
* Municipal waste
</b></span>Writing and speaking in questions spark new thinking and ideas, while statements tend to express concerns as if they are intractable. Asking questions has the power to lead to results.</br>
** Glass
*** RE-GLASS, Rail Enabled Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
* Construction and demolition waste
* Manufacturing waste
* Used batteries
* Wood biomass


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Gather all</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b> </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Perspective</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>s</b></span><b>
==== Transportation ====
</b>It’s commonly believed that including all stakeholders makes progress more challenging. In fact, inviting all experiences, concerns, and ideas leads to imaginative, intelligent, elegant results. When it comes to collective intelligence, more is truly the merrier.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Celebrate and Energize</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
* Railroads
</b></span>Leaning into positivity is vitally important to any concerted effort. We value each other’s participation and communicate our appreciation. </br>
** RE-SEED, Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development
* Trucking
* Pipelines
* Air Cargo
==[[What are the design criteria for CAPSI?]]==


</br>
==== What Principles do stakeholders want for CAPSI? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Be Accountable</b></span><b>
==== What Goals do stakeholders want to set? ====
</b>There is power in clarity. When we make a promise, include a completion time. Then, complete it on time or give a heads-up to the team and commit to a new time. When we first make an agreement, we may face barriers to accomplishing the new task. These challenges are a function of our commitment, not our lack of commitment. Stay in the game.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Embrace Knowledge Sharing </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
==== What Protocols do stakeholders agree on? ====
</b></span>Share rather than withhold information, ideas, and wisdom to create a world that works for all. Sharing accelerates productivity. It is time to scale up our collective intelligence.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>S</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>tep into IntelliSynthesis</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><SUP><b>®</b></SUP></span><b>
==== What Outcomes do stakeholders envision? ====
</b>IntelliSynthesis® is the logic and intelligence all around us but so often hidden from view by posturing, positioning, and politicizing. When we engage with others in the community’s best interest, collective intelligence naturally moves us toward solutions that work for everyone.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
* What outcomes do we want for the environment?
</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>Code of Ethics</b></u></span></br>
* What outcomes do we want for citizens?
* What outcomes do we want for business owners?
* What outcomes do we want for investors?
* What resources does society need and want?
* What goods does society need and want?


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Objectivity</b></span>
==== What Measures do stakeholders want to apply? ====
OnTrackNorthAmerica does not accept financial sponsorships that require prioritization of individual business agendas over shared interests.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Inclusivity</b></span>
==[[What is the timeline for CAPSI?]]==
OnTrackNorthAmerica invites representation from all involved stakeholder groups and facilitates “level playing field” dialogues wherein all participants’ perspectives are appreciated. Inclusivity is fundamental to our planning approach, and we welcome all regions and projects of any size.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Nonpartisanship</b></span>
==[[What outcomes do we want from redesigned industrial systems?]]==
OnTrackNorthAmerica maintains the autonomy of a politically non-partisan entity.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Coordination and Collaboration</b></span>
== [[How must capital deployment evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?]] ==
OnTrackNorthAmerica advances the thoughtful integration of collaboration with helpful competition.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Whole System Attention</b></span>
==== What do we call this approach to industrial investment? ====
OnTrackNorthAmerica embraces programs, policies, and planning that advance system-wide benefits.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Multimodalism</b></span>
* Sustainable Systems Capitalization
OnTrackNorthAmerica supports the utilization of all transport modes within a sound multimodal system.</br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
==== How do we want investors’ approach to capital deployment to evolve? ====
</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><u><b>Sustainability Commitment</b></u></span></br>


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Return-on-</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>I</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>nvestment</b></span></br>
==== How do we want stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve? ====


We believe that the return-on-investment analysis of economic development should account for all environmental and community impacts.</br>
==== How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Acknowledging </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>U</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>navoidable </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>E</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>lements</b></span></br>
==== How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve? ====


We acknowledge that some projects generate a degree of negative impact, which may be unavoidable in realizing a net positive contribution.</br>
==[[How must planning evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?]]==


</br>
==== How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Transition from </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>F</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>ossil </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>F</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>uels</b></span></br>
* What do we call this approach to supply chain-oriented industrial development?
** Collaborative Industrial Optimization
*** Focuses on existing businesses and their supply chains
*** Focuses on existing supply chains and new businesses and infrastructure that could serve the community
*** Private sector championed, led, and funded
*** What planning and investment domains are we connecting?
*** Public, Private, Community Collaboration
*** How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
*** What do we call this approach to land use?
*** Industrial Land Value Optimization
*** Embraces whole supply chains rather than just individual projects and properties


We support investments in projects that enable the transition from fossil fuels, petrochemicals, and overuse of water while acknowledging the pragmatic challenges on the journey to a cleaner economy. We guide our clients and communities to align their planning and investment horizons with the rapid evolution of these markets.</br>
==== How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems in advancing sustainability? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Connecting with </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>C</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>ommunity </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>S</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>tewards</b></span></br>
* What do we call this accounting?
** OnTrackNorthAmerica’s Land Freight Lifecycle Impact Analysis and Calculator reinvent benefit-cost analysis to guide sustainable highway and railway goods movement investments.
*** This approach to lifecycle analysis can be applied to an entire cradle-to-grave industrial system.


We advise project developers to interact proactively with community stewards, whose influence on advancing or blocking projects makes them valuable partners.</br>
==== What interactions among public and private sector entities must evolve to support systemwide sustainability? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Including </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>E</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>veryone</b></span></br>
* RFQs, RFIs, RFPs, Proposals, Contracts, Work Scopes, Reports, and Action Plans.


Including everyone benefiting from or impacted by a project is critical to successful design and implementation. </br>
==== What incentives for businesses and governments must evolve to support sustainable industrial systems? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Best Interest of </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>the </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>Community and Environment</b></span></br>
==== How do we want transportation and logistics to contribute to sustainable industrial systems? ====


As we level with everyone if a project is not economically viable, we also illuminate when the community's best interests or the environment are not being served.</br>
==[[How does planning have to evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?]]==


</br>
==== What do we call this approach to supply chain-oriented economic development? ====


<b>There are four steps to evaluating every project for alignment with these values</b><b> and goals</b><b>.</b></br>
* Collaborative Industrial Optimization


Each project’s commodities, activities, and impacts are cataloged.</br>
==== How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems? ====


For nuanced and complex projects, we conduct research to complete our understanding of environmental and community impacts.</br>
==== How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems? ====


We share our findings with the team and stakeholders to invite all perspectives.</br>
* What do we call this approach to land use?
** Industrial Land Value Optimization


Together, we decide how to influence the project’s sustainability properly.</br>
==== How do we want transportation planning to evolve in support of sustainable industrial systems? ====


<span style=color:#0070C0;><b>
==== How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems to advance sustainability? ====
</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>We </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>hold </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>ourselves accountable to </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>future </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>generations </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>by </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>working </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>only </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>on </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>projects </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>that </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>align with </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>a </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>sustainable </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>environment </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>and </b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>healthy communities</b></span><span style=color:#0070C0;><b>.</b></span></br>
 
* What do we call this accounting?
** Lifecycle Cost Analysis
*** This approach to lifecycle analysis can be applied to an entire cradle-to-grave industrial system.
*** OnTrackNorthAmerica’s Land Freight Lifecycle Impact Analysis and Calculator reinvent benefit-cost analysis to guide sustainable highway and railway goods movement investments.
 
==== What interactions among public and private sector entities must evolve to support systemwide sustainability? ====
 
* Laws
* Regulations
* Permitting
* RFQs
* RFIs
* RFPs
* Proposals
* Contracts
* Work Scopes
* Studies and Reports
* Action Plans
 
==== What incentives for individuals and organizations must evolve to support sustainable industrial systems? ====
 
* Targets
* Recognition
* Compensation
 
== [[What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?]] ==
==== Local ====
 
* Potential
** OnTrackPhiladelphia
* In Development
* In Action
 
==== Corridor ====
 
* Potential
* In Development
** Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy
** San Francisco Bay to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy
* In Action
 
==== State/Province ====
 
* Potential
** Canada-13
*** Alberta
*** British Columbia
*** Manitoba
*** New Brunswick
*** Newfoundland and Labrador
*** Northwest Territories
*** Nova Scotia
*** Nunavut
*** Ontario
*** Prince Edward Island
*** Quebec
*** Saskatchewan
*** Yukon
** United States-50
*** Alabama
*** Alaska
*** Arizona
*** Arkansas
*** California
*** Colorado
*** Connecticut
*** Delaware
*** Florida
*** Georgia
*** Hawaii
*** Idaho
*** Illinois
*** Indiana
*** Iowa
*** Kansas
*** Kentucky
*** Louisiana
*** Maine
*** Maryland
*** Massachusetts
*** Michigan
*** Minnesota
*** Mississippi
*** Missouri
*** Montana
*** Nebraska
*** Nevada
*** New Hampshire
*** New Jersey
*** New Mexico
*** New York
*** North Carolina
*** North Dakota
*** Ohio
*** Oklahoma
*** Oregon
*** Pennsylvania
*** Rhode Island
*** South Carolina
*** South Dakota
*** Tennessee
*** Texas
*** Utah
*** Vermont
*** Virginia
*** Washington
*** West Virginia
*** Wisconsin
*** Wyoming
** Mexico-32
*** Aguascalientes
*** Baja California
*** Baja California Sur
*** Campeche
*** Chiapas
*** Chihuahua
*** Coahuila
*** Colima
*** Durango
*** Guanajuato
*** Guerrero
*** Hidalgo
*** Jalisco
*** México
*** México City
*** Michoacán
*** Morelos
*** Nayarit
*** Nuevo León
*** Puebla
*** Oaxaca
*** Querétaro
*** Quintana Roo
*** San Luis Potosí
*** Sinaloa
*** Sonora
*** Tabasco
*** Tamaulipas
*** Tlaxcala
*** Veracruz
*** Yucatán
*** Zacatecas
** In Development
*** OnTrackNevada
*** OnTrackPennsylvania
** In Action
 
==== Regional/Multi-state ====
 
* Potential
*** Southeast Supply Chain Coalition
* In Development
* Southwest Supply Chain Coalition
* In Action
 
==== National ====
 
* Potential
** OnTrackMexico
** OnTrackCanada
** OnTrackUS
* In Development
* In Action
 
==== Continental ====
 
* OnTrackNorthAmerica
 
== [[What is the complete map of CAPSI’s industrial systems?]] ==
 
==== Mapping the physical system ====
What are the continent’s natural resources that we want to map?
 
== [[Who are the CAPSI stakeholders?]] ==
 
* Academia
* Advocacy
* Business
* Community
* Funders
* Government
* Labor
* Media
 
==[[How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?]]==
 
==[[How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems in advancing sustainability?]]==
 
==[[How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?]]==
 
==[[What interactions among public and private sector entities must evolve to support system wide sustainability?]]==
 
==[[What incentives for businesses and governments must evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?]]==
 
==[[How do we want transportation and logistics to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?]]==

Revision as of 17:09, 23 August 2024

What industrial systems must be redesigned for sustainability?

Natural Resources

Agriculture

  • Inputs
    • Land use
    • Soil
    • Water
    • Enhancements
  • Outputs
    • Food
    • Energy
    • Biomass
  • Processing

Materials

  • Paper
  • Steel
  • Packaging
  • Construction materials
    • Lumber
    • Aggregates
    • Cement
      • RE-CARD, Cement and Aggregates Regional Distribution
    • Refractory
  • Plastics

Energy

  • RE-POWER, Rail Enabled Power Distribution

Waste

  • Municipal waste
    • Glass
      • RE-GLASS, Rail Enabled Glass Logistics and Sustainable Supply
  • Construction and demolition waste
  • Manufacturing waste
  • Used batteries
  • Wood biomass

Transportation

  • Railroads
    • RE-SEED, Rail Enabled Sustainable Environment and Economic Development
  • Trucking
  • Pipelines
  • Air Cargo

What are the design criteria for CAPSI?

What Principles do stakeholders want for CAPSI?

What Goals do stakeholders want to set?

What Protocols do stakeholders agree on?

What Outcomes do stakeholders envision?

  • What outcomes do we want for the environment?
  • What outcomes do we want for citizens?
  • What outcomes do we want for business owners?
  • What outcomes do we want for investors?
  • What resources does society need and want?
  • What goods does society need and want?

What Measures do stakeholders want to apply?

What is the timeline for CAPSI?

What outcomes do we want from redesigned industrial systems?

How must capital deployment evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?

What do we call this approach to industrial investment?

  • Sustainable Systems Capitalization

How do we want investors’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?

How do we want stakeholders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?

How do we want lenders’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?

How do we want public agencies’ approach to capital deployment to evolve?

How must planning evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?

How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

  • What do we call this approach to supply chain-oriented industrial development?
    • Collaborative Industrial Optimization
      • Focuses on existing businesses and their supply chains
      • Focuses on existing supply chains and new businesses and infrastructure that could serve the community
      • Private sector championed, led, and funded
      • What planning and investment domains are we connecting?
      • Public, Private, Community Collaboration
      • How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?
      • What do we call this approach to land use?
      • Industrial Land Value Optimization
      • Embraces whole supply chains rather than just individual projects and properties

How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems in advancing sustainability?

  • What do we call this accounting?
    • OnTrackNorthAmerica’s Land Freight Lifecycle Impact Analysis and Calculator reinvent benefit-cost analysis to guide sustainable highway and railway goods movement investments.
      • This approach to lifecycle analysis can be applied to an entire cradle-to-grave industrial system.

What interactions among public and private sector entities must evolve to support systemwide sustainability?

  • RFQs, RFIs, RFPs, Proposals, Contracts, Work Scopes, Reports, and Action Plans.

What incentives for businesses and governments must evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?

How do we want transportation and logistics to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

How does planning have to evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?

What do we call this approach to supply chain-oriented economic development?

  • Collaborative Industrial Optimization

How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

  • What do we call this approach to land use?
    • Industrial Land Value Optimization

How do we want transportation planning to evolve in support of sustainable industrial systems?

How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems to advance sustainability?

  • What do we call this accounting?
    • Lifecycle Cost Analysis
      • This approach to lifecycle analysis can be applied to an entire cradle-to-grave industrial system.
      • OnTrackNorthAmerica’s Land Freight Lifecycle Impact Analysis and Calculator reinvent benefit-cost analysis to guide sustainable highway and railway goods movement investments.

What interactions among public and private sector entities must evolve to support systemwide sustainability?

  • Laws
  • Regulations
  • Permitting
  • RFQs
  • RFIs
  • RFPs
  • Proposals
  • Contracts
  • Work Scopes
  • Studies and Reports
  • Action Plans

What incentives for individuals and organizations must evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?

  • Targets
  • Recognition
  • Compensation

What are the geographic planning regions of CAPSI?

Local

  • Potential
    • OnTrackPhiladelphia
  • In Development
  • In Action

Corridor

  • Potential
  • In Development
    • Dallas to Texarkana I30 Corridor Strategy
    • San Francisco Bay to Salt Lake City I80 Corridor Strategy
  • In Action

State/Province

  • Potential
    • Canada-13
      • Alberta
      • British Columbia
      • Manitoba
      • New Brunswick
      • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • Northwest Territories
      • Nova Scotia
      • Nunavut
      • Ontario
      • Prince Edward Island
      • Quebec
      • Saskatchewan
      • Yukon
    • United States-50
      • Alabama
      • Alaska
      • Arizona
      • Arkansas
      • California
      • Colorado
      • Connecticut
      • Delaware
      • Florida
      • Georgia
      • Hawaii
      • Idaho
      • Illinois
      • Indiana
      • Iowa
      • Kansas
      • Kentucky
      • Louisiana
      • Maine
      • Maryland
      • Massachusetts
      • Michigan
      • Minnesota
      • Mississippi
      • Missouri
      • Montana
      • Nebraska
      • Nevada
      • New Hampshire
      • New Jersey
      • New Mexico
      • New York
      • North Carolina
      • North Dakota
      • Ohio
      • Oklahoma
      • Oregon
      • Pennsylvania
      • Rhode Island
      • South Carolina
      • South Dakota
      • Tennessee
      • Texas
      • Utah
      • Vermont
      • Virginia
      • Washington
      • West Virginia
      • Wisconsin
      • Wyoming
    • Mexico-32
      • Aguascalientes
      • Baja California
      • Baja California Sur
      • Campeche
      • Chiapas
      • Chihuahua
      • Coahuila
      • Colima
      • Durango
      • Guanajuato
      • Guerrero
      • Hidalgo
      • Jalisco
      • México
      • México City
      • Michoacán
      • Morelos
      • Nayarit
      • Nuevo León
      • Puebla
      • Oaxaca
      • Querétaro
      • Quintana Roo
      • San Luis Potosí
      • Sinaloa
      • Sonora
      • Tabasco
      • Tamaulipas
      • Tlaxcala
      • Veracruz
      • Yucatán
      • Zacatecas
    • In Development
      • OnTrackNevada
      • OnTrackPennsylvania
    • In Action

Regional/Multi-state

  • Potential
      • Southeast Supply Chain Coalition
  • In Development
  • Southwest Supply Chain Coalition
  • In Action

National

  • Potential
    • OnTrackMexico
    • OnTrackCanada
    • OnTrackUS
  • In Development
  • In Action

Continental

  • OnTrackNorthAmerica

What is the complete map of CAPSI’s industrial systems?

Mapping the physical system

What are the continent’s natural resources that we want to map?

Who are the CAPSI stakeholders?

  • Academia
  • Advocacy
  • Business
  • Community
  • Funders
  • Government
  • Labor
  • Media

How do we want public-sector economic development to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

How do we account for the full impact of industrial systems in advancing sustainability?

How do we want land use decisions to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

What interactions among public and private sector entities must evolve to support system wide sustainability?

What incentives for businesses and governments must evolve to support sustainable industrial systems?

How do we want transportation and logistics to contribute to sustainable industrial systems?

Retrieved from "https://ontracknorthamerica.org/index.php?title=Formatter_Testing&oldid=2490"